A big shout-out to my brother-in-law Andy, who’s celebrating his birthday today! Among other things, Andy is the bassist for The Ramoniacs, so I thought that the most appropriate tribute would be Happy Birthday, as performed by The Ramones for Mr. Burns on The Simpsons [286K, MP3]. Enjoy, and have a great one, Andy!
(I posted this to The Farm, but there are a fair number of techie readers of this blog, so I’m repeating it here.)

Hey, Bay Area folk!
Wanna get together and talk tech and other things with me and the boss
in February?
Ross and I will be attending the Evans Data Developer Relations
Conference in San Francisco. The conference
takes place on Monday, Fenbruary 6th and Tuesday, February 7th, but
we’re going to arrive early enough on Sunday to hold a meetup on the
evening of Sunday, February
5th. If you’re interested, drop me a line via email or in the
comments!
The conference is going to be held at the
Argent Hotel in
Square, and Ross and I will stay someplace near there. It’s
been a while since I lived in San Francisco (when I did developer
relations for OpenCola back in 2000/2001, so if any of you SFO locals
have suggestions for where to hold the meetup, let me know — once
again, email or in
the comments is fine.
Looking at the graphic that I made for the previous entry, I thought I
could do a better job with the lyrics to the version of The Who’s
Squeeze Box that I wrote for my (hopefully) outgoing MP, Sam Bulte. So
I fixed the lyrics, cleaned up the graphic a little and posted it here
for your enjoyment.
Feel free to copy the graphic and use it on your website, blog, stickers, whatever! Just get the word out and stop this woman and her industry pals from using copyright as a stick to beat even more money out of you.
I just got a press release in an email from Neil Leyton, a musican with whom I used to play when I was in Lindi’s band (see here, here, here, here and here). Neil’s been brightening the local music scene since his days in The Conscience Pilate and through his indie record label, Fading Ways Records (which, by the bye, is Creative Commons-friendly). I know him to be a pretty stand-up guy who works actively to promote new music that the big labels would otherwise eschew in favour of megahit pap, and would also recommend that you catch one of his live shows if you get the chance.
Now that I’ve dispensed with the preamble, here’s Neil’s press release:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Fading Ways Records & several Toronto Indie Artists protest the shameless sell out of a Canadian politician and potential Minister of Canadian Heritage to multi-national corporations’ lobbying interests in extremist copyright laws.
It has now become public knowledge that Liberal MP Sarmite Bulte, a long-time supporter of Canadian copyright “reform” and Bill C-60, has received significant campaign funding support from several industry players including several lobbying groups and trade associations such as Access Copyright, David Basskin’s CMRRA and even, sadly, SOCAN. While legal, these political contributions amount to an ethical conflict of interest that should be eradicated from Canadian politics.
The final straw here is that the multi-national major labels’ lobbying organization in Canada, CRIA, (the Canadian RIAA) is hosting a fundraiser for Bulte four days before the election. Tickets are $250 a plate.
CRIA, via their statistics-heavy press releases, persist on manipulating opinion polls and numbers to claim that they speak for Canadian citizens and the majority of Canadian artists – nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the interests of intermediaries like CRIA are not the same as the interests of the musicians, songwriters and other creator groups. CRIA can no more legitimately claim to politically represent musicians, than bank owners can claim to represent those who have bank accounts.
Furthermore, CRIA’s boast that they represent more than 95% records produced and sold in Canada is misleading. In fact, they represent the interests of the “Canadian” major labels, who are in fact cultural importers (largely of US acts) rather than exporters of Canadian artists. Very often Canadian artists like Danko Jones have to sign to foreign labels in order to export their own music. CRIA’s close ties to MP Bulte (“they are my friends”, she explained) are questionable and objectionable. Fading Ways Records believes that Canadian Heritage should be controlled by true Canadian cultural interests, not political sell-outs.
CRIA and the majors have launched a massive PR assault to convince the Canadian public that downloading and file-sharing hurts record sales – again, in the independent sector, nothing could be further from the truth. The internet helps new fans discover new artists, and “piracy” is nothing but a scapegoat for the major label’s failing business models that date back to the booming 80s. Indie CD sales are up, while major labels’ sales are down due to the rise in the DVD market, and the high-price of sub-quality releases they peddle to the masses via huge marketing budgets.Lastly, CRIA’s press release this past week dared to accuse the NDP of “abandoning their traditional support for artists” in order to attack the NDP Parkdale candidate, Peggy Nash. (CRIA candidate Sam Bulte’s opponent). Not true – the NDP is the only party that is aware of CRIA’s corporate attempt to hijack Canadian copyright legislation, which at this point remains the most balanced and fair copyright act when compared to the USA’s DMCA and the EU’s IP Enforcement Directive. One particular NDP candidate, Charlie Angus, is an independent musician, author and broadcaster himself.
Bill C-60, which Bulte and CRIA support, and Angus criticizes, is a narrowing, one-sided piece of legislation that will inadvertently cause law-abiding citizens to break the law. It makes copyright even more complex than it already is. Copyright being excessively complex is one of its greatest flaws, and if citizens and organizations without a team of lawyers are expected to obey it then it must be simplified rationally and in a balanced way such as that described by concerned citizens like Michael Geist.
Canadians, and citizens of the world in general, are not “pirates” at all. In fact, piracy is the high-seas act of armed robbery, pillaging, murdering and raping. We at Fading Ways find it offensive that the same word is now used to describe a social act of sharing that has traditionally been part of our culture (home-taping, mixed cassettes, etc.) and deemed acceptable for decades. What CRIA and Bulte would have us live in is an Orwellian State where present and future teens are limited to a mainstream culture of purchased goods with no room for cultural variety, diversification, or free exchange of opinions on what constitutes good music. One example of the type of “protection” endorsed by CRIA and Bulte is the recent Sony/BMG “rootkit” type of DRM (Digital Rights Management) that essentially hi-jacked people’s computers and was defined as “malware” even by Microsoft. The EFF has recently achieved an out-of-court compensation for fans whose consumers were affected by the Sony/BMG DRM copy protected discs that they purchased.
Neil Leyton and several Fading Ways Recording artists, as well as several Parkdale musical artists, hereby demonstrate their solidarity with the NDP Parkdale candidate, Peggy Nash. Neil Leyton is available to the press for further commenting on copyright, the indie music sector, and the questionable close links between CRIA and the Liberal MP – a strong connection that he had the opportunity to witness first hand at the U of T Law School conference “Copyrights, Copywrongs” held last year.
Canada’s copyright laws must not be hijacked by CRIA and Bulte.
Stop the music industry madness!
[via projectionist] You’ve probably heard of Creative Labs — they’re the folks behind the Sound Blaster card, which almost single-handedly brought Wintel machines into the multimedia age (kicking and screaming behind the Mac, which had better sound capabilities from the get-go). They’re not happy with the iPod’s prominence in the personal digital music player department, and as you can see on the page for their Zencast site, they’ve attempted to redefine the word “Podcast”:

Click this image to see a screen capture of the full page.
Contrary to what Creative will tell you, “Podcast” was not coined from “Personal on-demand broadcast.” It is a portmanteau (or if you prefer, neologism) of the words “iPod” and “broadcasting” coined by Ben Hammersley.
In the words of Jason Fried from 37signals: “A for effort, F for give me a fucking break.”
If there’s a Pavel Chekov award for getting history wrong (“Scotch was eenwented by lyeetle old lady een Leningrad!”), Creative Labs have a good shot at winning this year’s.
Full disclosure: As I make this entry, I’m listening to Johnny Cash’s When The Man Comes Around on the iPod nano that Wendy gave me for Christmas.
Today’s Sam Bulte news

Over at the CopyrightWatch.ca blog, David Fewer makes note of Sam Bulte’s evolution into a copyright politician (I added some formatting to make it easier to spot the campaign contributors):
Ms. Bulte was first elected in 1997. According to Elections Canada’s candidate contributions and expense reports, her campaign contributions totaled $67,423. Corporate sponsors aplenty, but no big copyright. And, interestingly, I cannot find reference to Ms. Bulte even uttering the word “copyright” until the dying months of that Parliament, when, as a member of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, she asked a few questions in a working sessions on a study of the Canadian book industry. She’d have to have slept pretty hard to avoid talking copyright there.
In the November, 2000, election, Ms. Bulte had managed to scoop up over $81,000 in campaign financing. And now some of the big copyright names are there:
- SOCAN
- The Canadian Motion Pictures Distributors Association
- Alliance Communications Corporation
- Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc.
- Epitome Pictures
- Chapters
- CanWest Global
- CTV
- Rogers Communications
- Baton Broadcasting
- Good Earth Ventures
- Astral Television Network
Interestingly, there are a number of other IP intensive industries represented:
- beer (Molsons)
- wine (Pilliteri Estates Winery)
- pharmaceuticals (Pfizer and Apotex – makes you wonder what she said to these two!)
[If you’re from Canada and especially Toronto, the name “Apotex” should ring a bell — they’re the drug company that sponsored Dr. Nancy Olivieri’s clinical drug trials and tried to suppress her findings of unexpected risks. — Joey]
And when the 37th Parliament began on January 29, 2001, voila, Ms. Bulte began publicly uttering pro-copyright platitudes. By April 2, 2001, Ms. Bulte stood in the House to “applaud” the initiatives of “the Canadian Association of Broadcasters and its partners, the Canadian Independent Record Production Association and the Canadian Recording Industry Association”. By December 6, 2001, Ms. Bulte was announcing to the House the imminent tabling of a copyright bill. And, on June 18, 2002, Ms. Bulte spoke on third reading of Bill C-48, the Internet retransmission exemption won by broadcasters. A Canadian copyright politician is born.
Her interest in copyright — or more accurately, the misapplication of copyright by corporations — is merely a byproduct of the crowd she’s running with. This is like the kid in high school who went to the UK for three weeks during summer vacation and came back with an accent and calling trucks “lorries”, but with far bigger implications.
For the greater good (and for your enjoyment as well), I’ve bookended this blog entry with a couple of modified Sam Bulte graphics that you can freely post on your websites, blogs or print out and turn into signs or stickers. Enjoy!

Guile hit it on the nose during the 2004 federal election, and his statement applies doubly this time around:
“I think the Liberals need to take a time out, stand in the corner and think about what they’ve done.”