Categories
In the News Music

A Buck Doesn’t Go as Far Anymore

I know that I brought this fact up in the previous entry, but I thought it bore repeating in its own entry.

What $250 bought in 1987: In November 1987, for the cost of $250, The Cowboy Junkies recorded The Trinity Session at the Church of the Holy Trinity, using only a single microphone and the church’s acoustics. It would give the Junkies international renown and many music critics would call it one of the best albums of 1988.

What $250 will buy you in 2006: A plate of food at a sellout politician’s fundraising dinner, a live performance by one Cowboy Junkie and an opportunity to pee in the karma pool.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Cowboy Junkies, "Piracy", and How it Made Them Big

Those of you who weren’t teenagers in the 1980s may not remember the image to the right. Back then, the technology that the entertainment industry feared was good old magnetic tape. The industrial-entertainment complex’s movie arm was fighting the Betamax; MPAA capo Jack Valenti famously testified before Congress that “the VCR is to the American film producer and the American

public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone”. In the end, Hollywood discovered that the new rental market opened by videotape technology was a gold mine.

Meanwhile, the music industry was fighting the tape battle on two fronts: home taping on analog cassettes whose fidelity would be considered laughable today, and the possible threat of DAT — digital audio tape. They insisted that the mix tapes that I made for girls I like were threatening the livelihoods of Depeche Mode and The Smiths, while they were running ads in musicians’ magazines screaming that DAT was the devil. Before I became the Accordion Guy, I was a synth guy, and I remember reading two-page centrefold ads in Keyboard magazine with large headlines that read “Don’t let them do DAT!”

As with videotapes, we know what happened with audiotape: home taping did not destroy the music industry, which grew in leaps and bounds as the music scene grew. While DAT as a medium never made it big in the consumer market, the underlying technology — digital music  — did.


The fundraiser for Sam Bulte being held tonight at the Drake Hotel will feature a performance by Margo Timmins. You may remember her band, The Cowboy Junkies, best known for their album, The Trinity Session. Recorded on a single microphone in the Church of the Holy Trinity for $250 (ironically, that’s the per-plate price of admission to the fundraising dinner at which Margo is performing tonight), this album was originally released on a small label and got its buzz based on word-of-mouth and thousands of mix tapes that teenagers — myself included — made for each other.
 
Back then, one way to declare your love (or at least infatuation) for a girl or guy was to make a “mix tape” of songs for her or him. If you were particularly creative, you’d embellish the tape with an artistic J-card (that’s the cardboard liner that went into the cassette case — here’s an example). The important thing about a mix tape was that it let you say things that it provided a kind of indirection — a way of saying things that you might not otherwise be able to say in a face-to-face conversation (instant messaging may be like that today).

I remember making mix tapes for girls I liked back at Crazy Go Nuts University. Like any guy who’d begun to figure out women even a little bit, I knew to include Sweet Jane from The Trinity Session on those tapes. I’d be willing to bet that the real marketing for The Trinity Session wasn’t done by the record company, but by tens of thousands of people like me, making mix tapes as a form of courting and for make-out mood music. Therein lies the irony of Ms. Timmins performing at tonight’s fundraiser: the viral marketing that made her big back then (and that’s also helping pull them out of the “where are they now?” file) is precisely the sort of thing that the people backing this fundraiser are trying to kill with the help of Ms. Bulte.


A copule of musical gifts for you: this page on Pastestore.com features Waltz Across America, the Cowboy Junkies’ 2000 live album. It offers two free MP3s from the album: Sweet Jane and Misguided Angel (somewhat apropos), both songs that first appeared in The Trinity Session.

Here’s another goodie — Mixed Messages, a comic from the old dot-com era site Breakup Girl. Breakup Girl was an romantic advice-dispensing superhero, and in this adventure, she helps a guy tap the power of the mix tape.

Categories
Uncategorized

Why "Future Fuzzy" Wears That Hat

One of the webcomics I enjoy is Sam Logan’s Sam and Fuzzy, which could be described as “the adventures of a lovable loser and a short, psychotic bear”. The author recommends that new readers start reading from the January 3rd, 2005 strip; I think that you can start as early as late 2003, which is when I felt the comic really started hitting its stride. You might also want to check out the readers’ guide.


The first appearance of Future Fuzzy. Click to see the comic at full size.

Some of my favourite Sam and Fuzzy strips are the ones featuring

“Future Fuzzy”, a future version of Fuzzy who arrives in a flash of

light from 24 hours in the future to warn Fuzzy of impending doom. The warnings are usually worthless, but amusing.


Click the comic to see it at full size.

In the comic, there’s a convention that people from the future wear sombreros with little pompons that dangle from the brim. Even the future version of “Roger”, a decapitated head whom Fuzzy considers a friend and advisor, wears such a hat:


Click the comic to see it at full size.

The “future hat” seemed familiar to me. I’d seen such a hat associated with a time travel story before, but couldn’t put my finger on where. It’s been bugging me for about year now.

Last night, I was flipping through some old X-Men comics, when I stumbled across this image from X-Men Annual #14, from 1990. Get a load of Rachel Summers’ hat!

Rachel Summers, for those of you not familiar with the X-Men comics of the mid-80s to early 1990s, is the daughter of Scott “Cyclops” Summers and Jean Grey from an alternate future timeline.

The future from whence Rachel comes is a dystopian one, where mutants are hunted down and either killed or put into concentration camps. Rachel has been sent back from the future to do what she can to prevent it from happening, and to warn the present-day X-Men.

So that’s where I’d seen the “future hat” before. It all makes sense now.

Geek mystery solved!

Categories
In the News It Happened to Me

My Biggest Source of "Hits" Today…

…is the Macleans piece, Wrath of the Bloggers, which features quotes from Cory Doctorow, Michael Geist and yours truly. Right now, 15% of this weblog’s incoming traffic is coming from there.

Categories
Uncategorized

Online Rights’ Canada’s Balanced Meal — Tomorrow at the Drake

In the same hotel as the one where Sam Bulte’s $250-a-plate fundraiser — er, celebration — is being held, Online Rights Canada will be holding a Balanced Meal where the talk will be about “why MPs shouldn’t take cash from the industries they regulate”, the way Sam Bulte is.

The fun runs from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Drake Hotel’s corner cafe (the Drake is at 1150 Queen Street West, two blocks east of Dufferin). Online Rights Canada says that the Cafe’s macaroni and cheese is tasty; I will also vouch for their “Notorious B.U.R.G.” hamburger. Check out their menu [PDF].

A couple of things to note about the Balanced Meal:

  1. This is a nonpartisan event, and we don’t have any position

    on how you should vote in the coming election. Partisan raconteurs need

    not apply.

  2. ORC can’t pay for dinner. Sorry, but we’re a not-for-profit organization!
  3. Please RSVP to info [at] OnlineRights.ca. Seating will be limited, but we love a crowd.

Be there — I will, and with accordion, even!

Categories
In the News

Sorry, Sam, But Your $250-a-plate Party IS a Fundraiser

Michael Geist writes in his blog about the fundraising dinner being thrown by Sam Bulte’s Big Content snugglebuddies:

Now, despite clearly

labelling the event as a fundraiser on her own website,

she’s arguing it isn’t a fundraiser at all.  Instead, in response to

the question “How can we count on you to carry on. . . impartially when

you are taking money from special interest groups?”, the Star reports

that Bulte responded:

“They are not hosting a fundraiser for me. It’s a celebration of my support for the arts community.”

We should all be so lucky to have celebrations where each guest forks over $250. If each of you cheapskates who attended my birthday party had done that, I’d be entering this blog entry in a zignone wool suit from Harry Rosen.

Since what Sam says has often proven to be at variance with what she does, I decided to be empirical and go take a look at her site. Here’s a screen capture of her site as of 10:45 a.m. this morning:

I see the word “FUNDRAISER” in capitals, clear as day. How ’bout you?

I downloaded the invitation, which I’ve put here for your reference [80K PDF], in case someone at her campaign gets smart (unlikely) and replaces it. Here’s what the top of the first page looks like:

I believe that phrases “cordially invite you to an artists’ and creators’ fundraiser for Sam Bulte” and “All funds raised will go to Sam’s re-election campaign” strongly suggest that this “celebration” is indeed a fundraiser. If you’re still not convinced, there’s the note at the bottom of the first page that reads:

Tax receipt will be issued for the eligible portion of the cost

You can hand out tax receipts for “celebrations”? I should’ve handed some out at my legendary hot tub party!

Finally, there’s this legal statement on the second page of the invitation:

Please note the new contribution limits as at January 1, 2004: Individuals may contribute up to a total of $5,000 in a calendar year to a registered party and its registered associations; candidates and nomination contestants. Corporations and trade unions may contribute up to a total of $1,000 in a calendar year to the registered electoral district associations; candidates; and nomination contestants. Crown corporations and corporations that receive 50% or more of their funding from the federal government will not be able to make any contributions.

It’s a fundraiser, all right. What kind of idiots does she take us for?

Categories
In the News It Happened to Me Toronto (a.k.a. Accordion City)

Even More Questions from the All-Candidates Meeting

That’s right, even more from my notes on last week’s all-candidates meeting. In case you missed them, here are my earlier entries on that meeting:


Question Seven: The Gun Crime Question

What are you going to do about gun crime?

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • This is a question that I hear repeatedly, and there are no simple fixes for this problem
  •    

  • Nobody needs a gun
  •    

  • Many of the guns are coming from south of the border [remember, American readers, to us, “south of the border” means “America”]
  •    

  • The border is unpatrolled in many places and there isn’t enough staff to cover all of it
  •    

  • Gun crimes need to be treated with mandatory jail time
  •    

  • Also need to work on communities — “poverty by postal code”

Sam Bulte   

  • Key gun crime laws died on the table because of the vote of non-confidence [which led to this election]
  •    

  • We need more police — both local and RCMP
  •    

  • We need to work with youth as well — there has to be some prevention — can’t just be “law and order”
  •    

  • We should ban guns

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party   

  • We can’t resort to an “iron-fisted approach”
  •    

  • Society has to live up to its responsibilities, and individuals have to live up to their responsibilities
  •    

  • We have to balance going on the offensive with respecting people’s rights
  •    

  • “Arc of poverty” — one-quarter of the people in the city live below the poverty line

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party   

  • This is possibly the most important issue
  •    

  • There’s a “big business” running the streets — the drug trade
  •    

  • The drug trade and guns are intertwined
  •    

  • Tougher laws and mandatory sentences for gun crimes

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • mumble mumble mumble Legalization of marijuana will end organized crime mumble mumble

Rob Rischinsky, Green Party   

  • We already have strong gun laws
  •    

  • The problem is with illegally-obtained guns
  •    

  • Let people who want to have gun collections keep them, but make it so the guns in those collections are non-functional
  •    

  • Gun sport enthusiasts can also keep their guns, but store them at the place where they are used [e.g. their shooting range]
  •    

  • We believe in restorative justice

Question 8: What will you do for seniors?

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party   

  • Many of the programs in place for seniors were put there by the Liberals

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party   

  • Here in Canada, we have the resources to provide for all
  •    

  • Unfortunately, providing for everyone’s needs is not a principle we follow

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party   

  • We will give patient care gurantees
  •    

  • We want to expand the definiton of “caregiver” so that more people who take care of the elderly qualify for benefits

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • We would like to commit $1 billion a year over the next four years to programs that would give more seniors the ability to stay in their own homes rather than go to old folks’ homes

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • mumble mumble Revenues from marijuana mumble mumble mumble

Rob Rischinsky, Green Party   

  • Some reasons that older people need help: pollution and our lifestyle
  •    

  • Wait till the boomers hit the system
  •    

  • We want to provide universal access to senior care

Question 9: The Environment

[My notes on the question are bunged up, but it’s a question about the environment.]


Rob Rischinsky, Green Party
   

  • We can have both economic prosperity and environmental health
  •    

  • Look at Sweden: since 1990, their GDP has gone up 54% while pollution has gone down 25%
  •    

  • Kyoto [the accord] is the first step
  •    

  • Note that there was no mention of the environment in the televised debates

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • The NDP has made sure that money was given to the TTC and the energy retrofit program
  •    

  • We stand for:       
             

    • Clean air
    • Clean water
    • Making polluters pay
    • National energy retrofit program
    •        

  • [The way we’ve implemented] Kyoto is a national shame

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • mumble mumble hemp mumble mumble forests mumble mumble fuel

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party   

  • The Kyoto Accord — led by the Liberal party
  •    

  • Funded Great Lakes cleanups, targeted Toronto
  •    

  • We have invested $5.1 billion in the environment

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party   

  • The type of economy we live in will always clash with the environment
  •    

  • As long as the profit motive exists, that clash will always exist

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party   

  • Kyoto is a disgrace
  •    

  • We’ve missed every deadline
  •    

  • Now we have to buy credits
  •    

  • We proposed tax credits for people who take public transit
  •    

  • We will invest in renewable fuels