Did anyone in town attend last night’s cuddle party?

“I love you, man!”

“Ensign, I don’t think you’re in uniform.”
The Henrico Country Public School Board (they’re in Richmond, Virginia)
has 1,000 iBook G3s that they’re selling for US$50 each. That’s right
— fifty bucks!
Here are the specs:
White Power PC G3 iBook
The machines has OS X 10.2.8 and AppleWorks installed.
This is pretty the same type of iBook I had and sold a couple of years ago,
shortly after I joined Tucows. I sold mine for CDN$800 (currently
US$650). I used it primarily as a Unix hacking box for developing PHP
and Python apps for clients.
Here are the rules:
E. Laburnum Ave., Richmond, VA.
If anyone is planning to attend this sale and bring an extra
person who doesn’t want to purchase one, drop me a line! I’d gladly
send you the cash to cover the purchase of one plus shipping — I’d
love to use one as an internet radio/house MP3 player/home automation
thingy.
One of the best ways to get up my nose is to accuse me of not knowing what I’m talking about. This happens in my comments once in a blue moon, and I usually have to become the commenter’s Dad and “take him or her to school in the car of pain”. Hop aboard, Junior!
Normally, I’d take this up in the comments, but they’ve been buried in spam as of late. Besides, I’m the captain of this blog, and if someone wants to accuse me of ignorance, I reserve the right to spank him or her in a top-level article.
Here’s the comment that started it:
I think you either have the term wrong; you likely mean traders or some other creature of Wall Street but investment bankers do things like getting money for IPOs not give out stock tips to the media.
Do you really know what an investment bank does? I suspect this is not the case.
I replied to the little snot as follows:
You’re wrong and right:
WRONG: I know what an investment banker does. I’ve met a number doing dog-and-pony shows during the dot-com days. Some of them could use a smack on the head anyways.
RIGHT: I had a brain fart while typing. The term I’m looking for is investment analyst. I’ve met these too, and shall correct the entry.
Not happy with having lost some debating points, the commenter fired back:
You can acuse [sic] investment analysts of many things (I am an economist and the party line on them is that they must either be charlatans or they should not be talking to you) but they dont really shuffle wealth around, mostly they give their opinion on the value of an asset. that is they are Appreisers [sic] who happen to specialize on assets that pay dividends and which have payouts linked to the fortunes of some legal corporation.
I cant see how it could be true that “shuffling it [wealth] around.” is all they do without it being true of all people who work as appraisers, can you?
Whacked-out assumptions and failed analogies: this person really must be an economist!
Claiming that they are charlatans and then saying that they aren’t shufflers of wealth is contradictory. Shuffling wealth — into their pockets and those of their friends — rather than creating it is what charlatans do!
Secondly, I don’t think all appraisers are shufflers of wealth; some actually provide useful services, and those services are the creation of wealth. The commenter’s assertion is the classic “confusing the whole for the part” tactic from high school debating. Here’s an only-slightly-more-ridiculous statement using the same line of reasoning:
I shall close by addressing the commenter using the terminology of his/her field of “study”: the supply of your babble exceeds the demand.
Bonus reading: Economist Jokes!
In the comments to my recent article about the job of “Cuddle Party Facilitator”, Carla points to this announcement of upcoming Cuddle Parties in downtown Accordion City.
There’s a mixed-gender one tomorrow and a
queer-positive/tranny-positive one next Wednesday; if you’re going,
make sure you attend the right one!
(Not familiar with the term “Cuddle Party”? See here. Then go here.)
Even more interesting than the announcements are the comments. As I
write this, there hasn’t yet been a single positive comment, which is
saying something considering that these are people on LiveJournal
(whose motto should be “With friends like these, who needs hallucinations?”).
As my friends and regular readers of this blog will know, I’m getting hitched in September and had to vacate my lovely Queen and Spadina house for someplace a little more suitable for two. The house was great, but a tad too expensive for just two people; the rent situation would be made worse by the fact that Wendy won’t even be eligible to work here for a few months. A couple of people suggested sharing the house with roommates. This is not a good idea — a married couple living with roommates is a good setup for a sitcom, but probably a disaster waiting to happen in real life.
Since my landlords J. and B. live in London (England, not Ontario), it would have been difficult for them to advertise the house and show it to potential tenants. They offered me a nice sum of money — enough to cover the expense of hiring professionals to move me to my new place — to act as their agent. I was given the additional responsibility of not only publicizing the place, but also to screen candidates for suitability based on J. and B’s criteria and my understanding of the house and the neighbourhood based on 6 years of living there and being part of the community.
After talking it over with J., we decided to use two different advertising media:
Here’s an approximation of the Toronto Star Classfied ad:
| ARCHITECT’S RENOVATION |
| QUEEN & SPADINA: 3 Bed, hi-end bi-level 2 bath a/c garage hrdwd floors laundry $2100/mo call 416-948-6447 joey@joeydevilla.com |
It’s the black hole of advertising: so dense that not even information can escape!
J. suggested that we spend a little extra money and pay for flourishes like the border and the white-on-black headline in order to stand out on the page. Seeing as the idea had some merit to it and we weren’t spending my money, I ordered these extras.
The ad got a total of 20 responses, leading to about a dozen viewings, which in turn led to 2 recommendations. Near the end of the week-long ad run, I was called and emailed twice each by an automated reminder system reminding me to book another week if I needed to.
The ad ran for one week in both the paper as well as the web site and cost $520.66.
Here’s what the Craigslist ad looked like:
$2100 / 3br – Great 3 bed 2 bath place near downtown (Queen and Spadina)This place is takes up the first floor and basement of a historic brick house in the Queen Spadina area. It’s gorgeous, unusual, was featured on the “Love By Design” television show and you can roll out bed and land in Chinatown or Queen Street West! The first floor features:
The basement features:
The house also has a back patio which leads to a garage shared with the upper unit. The current tenant in the upper unit does not have a car. Want to see more photos? Take a look here. Rent is $2100/month and water is included — you pay for Hydro and gas. Available July 15th, although you might be able to move in some stuff sooner. Call Joey at (416) 948-6447 for details. Sullivan at Spadina google map yahoo map
|
This conveys considerably more information about the place: its features, what it looks like, a bit of the history and it links to even more information.
In the same week-long period that the Star Classifieds ad ran, this adgarnered 55 responses. Since the ad was free, I ran it longer and it produced more than 85 responses, which was when I stopped counting.
In the three-week period during which the ad ran, it cost me $0.00. Nuthin’. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Honkis de konkis. In the words of my fiancee’s people: bubkes.
In the case of finding tenants for my old place, which is considerably closer to the city core (here’s a map showing a route from the old place to the heart of the financial district), Craigslist proved to be the better choice. It provided practically infinitely more space than the Star classified, provided an anonymized link to my email address and was free. Not only did it yield considerably more respondents; it also landed more suitable ones too: working professionals used to downtown living, who looked as though they’d take good care of the place. The Star ad drew in a larger proportion of people from the deep burbs who had that sort of attitude that the burbs was where one lived and downtown was a grittier kind of mall or playground where you could shop, get drunk, act like an idiot and start fights.
The winning candidate was someone who’d seen the Craigslist listing, not the Star classified. You should keep in mind that there are many circumstances in which the Star classifieds will beat Craigslist. As my housemate Rob and I have observed in our respective apartment-hunts, the farther from the city core you look, the better the Star‘s selection becomes. In the neighbourhood where I was looking (here’s a map showing a route from the new place to the heart of the financial district), the selection of places was much better in the Star than in Craigslist. I found my current place through the Star classifieds.
(Point of information: I also found the old place through the Star classfieds, but that was back in 1999. Internet use wasn’t as common as it is now, and Craigslist was still largely limited to they Bay Area then.)
For the purpose of finding tenants for my old place, Craigslist soundly beat the Toronto Star classifieds. It yielded considerably more candidates and was infinitely cheaper. Well done, Craigslist; I salute you with a filet mignon on a flaming sword!
One of the most popular Blogware-based blogs out there is Random Acts of
Reality,
written by a blogger who goes by the name of Tom Reynolds, an ambulance
driver with the London Ambulance Service. Tom often writes about his
experiences at work, which are sometimes funny, sometimes harrowing,
but often interesting to read.
I had the pleasure of meeting Tom last November, when he flew from
London to Toronto to attend my
birthday/engagement party
(among other things). We met by reading each other’s blogs, a testament
to the fact that you’ll never know who’ll you’ll meet by
blogging.
Tom’s blog has garnered him a fair bit of media exposure, the latest
being BBC News’ piece on him titled Ambulance Blogger
Tells All.