
I’m sure that even Owen thinks this is a bad idea.

I’m sure that even Owen thinks this is a bad idea.
Found via my current favorite Twitter account, You Had One Job.
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
Every Friday morning at 8:00 a.m., some of Tampa Bay’s most engaged citizens come to the main room in Oxford Exchange’s Commerce Club to attend Café con Tampa, a weekly gathering where guest speakers talk about issues that the Bay and the world beyond. It’s attended by an interesting audience that’s often a mix of movers and shakers from the worlds of arts, business, academia, and government, and put together by local heroes Del Acosta, President of the Historic Hyde Park Neighborhood Association, and Bill Carlson, President of the communciations agency Tucker/Hall. Over the past little while, I’ve had the chance to attend, enjoy Oxford Exchange’s delicious breakfast buffet (it’s part of the $12 admission), and see some interesting speakers, including:
Yann Weymouth, architect and designer of the Salvador Dali Museum in St. Pete, and chief designer for I.M. Pei on the Grand Louvre Project in ParisTomorrow’s (Friday, August 18) speaker is Dr. Todd Willis, and he’ll be talking about the Physician’s Assistant Program at the USF and the expanding healthcare workforce. If you’d like to attend, the admission is $12 (cash only), and it includes a nice breakfast spread including fruit, Oxford Exchange’s fantastic bacon/egg and egg sandwiches, bread, a really good granola cereal, coffee, and tea. There’s even a deal for students or other grassroots community leaders who can’t afford the meal; talk to Barbara at the door for details.
Rick Baker. Creative Commons photo by BAJohnson — click to see the source.
Last Friday’s guest speaker was Rick Baker, mayor of St. Petersburg, Florida from 2001 to 2010, and one of the two leading candidates for St. Pete’s 2017 mayoral election (the other is the current mayor, Rick Kriseman, making this election the Battle of the Ricks).
At the time of writing, the election’s going Baker’s way; the polls from last week say that he has a 6-point lead over Kriseman, and in their July 28th editorial, the Tampa Bay Times endorsed him for mayor. Bill Carlson introduced him by talking about times when he and Baker went for neighborhood walks around St. Pete. “Where most people see the empty lot,” Bill said, “Rick would point out the newly-renovated house, or the fixed sidewalk.”
Here are my annotated notes from his talk:
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
You have repeatedly said the mayor is a non-partisan position. Will you state for the record that you won’t campaign for the Republicans if you become mayor?
St. Pete has been a welcoming place for the LGBT community. What will you do to continue support of that community as part of the city’s economic development?
Note: Baker’s use of the word “seamlessness” is most likely a reference to an idea he put forth in his 2011 book The Seamless City: A Conservative Mayor’s Approach to Urban Revitalization That Can Work Anywhere.
How will you increase taxes to improve public transportation?
What will you do to keep St. Pete affordable for small businesses and homeowners?
Would you commit money to continue the Cross-Bay Ferry pilot project?
Assuming Tropicana field became available, how would it fit with your plans for the city?
How do you view light rail?
I don’t want to make this a partisan question, but back in the 80s it never occurred to me to ask what party a mayor belonged to. But with the current political situation and St. Pete’s “strong mayor” system, and a largely Democratic city council, it does. If you become mayor, there will be hard feelings. How might you end the divide?
Photo by Joey deVilla. Click to see it at full size.
Café con Tampa runs on a fairly strict 8:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. schedule since in takes place within a private club, and as the organizers like to say, “the lease runs out at 9”. This means that the Q&A ends at 9 and most attendees file out and make their way to the rest of their day, but there are always a number of stragglers who stick around to network and ask the guest speaker one-on-one questions. Between my recent attendance and the accordion, I’ve gotten to know some of the regulars, and stayed to catch up with them as well as ask Baker a question. While waiting to have a moment with him, I listened as other people asked him their questions.
Having come from the city that elected Rob Ford, who used to rails about “the war on the car” and against cyclists, it’s unusual for me to hear a conservative mayoral candidate talk about the importance of walkable cities, and how people really come to appreciate places that they walk to and through. To one person, he recommended that they read Richard Florida’s writings on the Creative Class and the value they bring to cities. To another, he talked about how it wasn’t always obvious to taxpayers that putting money into cultural and liveabilty was actually economic development. He also talked about how municipal governments more often can’t change a city for the better through direct means, but often do so indirectly by putting the right elements into place.
I asked him one question: With your involvement and influence in the community as a private citizen, why run for mayor again? I’ve talked to a number of people who’ve had similar positions, and while they enjoyed their leadership stint, they say they’d do it only once, and never again. His answer was simple: there’s only so much he could do as a private citizen, and that current mayor Rick Kriseman’s mishandling of a number of issues — including the sewage debacle, in which 200 million gallons of sewage was dumped into Tampa Bay — inspired his run.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t point you to SaintPetersblog’s coverage of Baker’s talk.
This comic by Cameron Davis made me chuckle:
Click the comic to see it at full size.
While I’m on the topic of Indiana Jones and Nazis, it’s time to bring up one of my all-time favorite movie lines:

They’re not kidding; that’s Keith Broni’s actual job.

Noting the President’s vague response to the awfulness in Charlottesville — a rambling off-the-cuff speech in which he failed to denounce white nationalists and neo-Nazis, threw in a non sequitur mention of Barack Obama, threw in his own name because he can’t stand it when he isn’t mentioned, and condemned hate on “many sides” — John Oliver opened last night’s episode of Last Week Tonight with this:
He has some very good lines:
I had to disavow the Nazis. Why can’t the President? Part of the Green Card process is answering a question where the right answer is to clearly and unequivocally disavow the Nazis, which I did easily, gladly, and proudly. You’d think the President would be able do the same, but…
Thanks to Mark Relph for the find!

That’s me on the right, on Thursday, January 26, 2017, celebrating the acquisition of my permanent resident status in the United States. It means that I am in possession of what’s colloquially known as a “green card”.
Of the many things you have to do to qualify for a green card, one of the is filling out the I-485 form, which is more formally known as the Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status:
Part 8 of the I-485 is called General Eligibility and Inadmissibility Grounds, and is made up of 67 questions, one of which asks you if you somehow were involved with the Nazis:
Here’s the text of the question:
During the period from March 23, 1933 to May 8, 1945, did you ever order, incite, assist, or otherwise participate in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion, in association with either the Nazi government of Germany or any organization or government associated or allied with the Nazi government of Germany?
That’s right: In the process that determined whether I was allowed to call this place home, I had to disavow any connection with the Nazis. And I did so easily, gladly and proudly.
So why can’t the President?
He was uncharacteristically silent for the first part of Saturday, when stories about the torch gathering the night before and neo-Nazis on the street that morning were already circulating:
Hell of a day for the President to forget how to tweet. pic.twitter.com/ABffmwwH8D
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) August 12, 2017
When he finally made a statement that afternoon, it was this weak sauce…
We ALL must be united & condemn all that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in America. Lets come together as one!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 12, 2017
…and his televised speech was equally mitigated:
It’s uncharacteristic of him — he’s usually pretty quick to “name names”:
The president has been more directly critical of TV hosts, cable news, actresses, comedy shows, & the intelligence community than of nazis.
— Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) August 12, 2017
The slow, faint response wasn’t lost on former Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard and high-profile white nationalist David Duke, who took it as implicit support…
…as did his sleazebag buddies at the Daily Stormer:
Here’s the text from that screenshot (because there’s no way in Hell that I’m linking to the Daily Stormer):
3:46 p.m.: Trump comments were good. He didn’t attack us. He just said the nation should come together. Nothing specific against us.
He said that we need to study why people are so angry, and implied that there was hate…on both sides!
So he implied the antifa were haters.
There was virtually no counter-signaling of us at all.
He said he loves us all.
Also refused to answer a question about White Nationalists supporting him.
No condemnation at all.
When asked to condemn, he just walked out of the room.
Really, really good.
God bless him.

I’ll say it again:
I easily, gladly, and proudly disavowed the Nazis in front of witnesses, including my wife, my lawyer, and a U.S. government official.
Why can’t the President do the same in front of the American people?
It’s a shame that the I-485’s “Nazi question” is limited to the time period from March 1933 through May 1945. Even a kid who turned the minimum qualifying age — 10 — for the junior division of the Hitler Youth on V-E day would be 82 years old at the time of this writing. I think that it should be phrased more like question 56, the “Communist question”, which asks if you’ve ever, during any point in time, in any country, been part of or tied to the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party: