Here’s a photo that someone snapped of me last Friday at the Gladstone Hotel during the Contact photography festival:
Click the image to see the original photo on Flickr.
Here’s a photo that someone snapped of me last Friday at the Gladstone Hotel during the Contact photography festival:
Click the image to see the original photo on Flickr.
James Montier is an investment banker with Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (a European bank) who often writes sober, fiscally conservative reports urging people to invest their money in a sober, fiscally conservative manner. His report titled Part Man, Part Monkey [PDF version | web version] has a pretty good “top ten list” for avoid financial pitfalls. The Gambler’s Fallacy [PDF version | web version] takes a look at a common misperception that plagues both gamblers and investors alike.
The paper of Montier’s that really caught my attention is titled If It makes You Happy [189K PDF], one in which he doesn’t talk about investing at all — at least not in the way we think of it. It’s about a pet topic of mine, something I might go so far as to call a hobby: happiness.
The first question he asks in his essay is “Why be happy?” Here’s his list of answers, which are listed below and are based on “based on careful scientific studies (rather than cheap self help books!)”. (He also directs the reader to Dr. Sonja Lyubomirsky at University of Califonia Riverside, who has devoted the majority of her reasearch career to studying human happiness.)
I’m certain you can come up with your own list of reasons that best suits you.
I’m posing this question in the broadest sense — what are the general categories of factors that contribute to our happiness? According to a paper by Sheldon, Lyubomirsky and Schkade titled Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change [PDF version | web version], it boils down to three general factors:
Here’s how the three factors listed above break down, according to the research. The stuff in red are my annotations.

Note that circumstances plays the smallest role. That’s due to something called hedonic adaptation, a ten-dollar term that has the same essence as the saying “time heals all wounds”. We have an ability to adjust to changes to our lives, good or bad, and assimilate them so that they become “the new normal”. We get used to getting a job with a bigger income, the initial flush of a new romance eventually fades (either into something longer-term or it fizzles out) and the dream place you moved to will sooner or later just be part of your everyday life. Lest you think that hedonic adaptation is a bad thing, it also blunts the sting of a death in the family over time and lets you get over the many defeats that life will hand you.
The research shows that money does not necessarily equal happiness. In fact, a survey of over 7000 students across 41 countries found that those who valued love more than money reported greater satisfaction with their lives than those who valued money over love. Here’s the chart of the results:

(Don’t get me wrong. Viewed as a means to certain kinds of freedom, money can assist happiness. It’s just not the whole ball o’ wax.)
I’ve already mentioned that there’s not much you can do about the set point of happiness that got installed in you at the factory. Barring some kind of gene therapy for happiness, you can either languish in Philip Larkin’s poem:
They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
…or you can concentrate on the factor that you can best control: intentional activity.
As any biologist will tell you, genes plus environment equals “this is your life”. Intentional activity is simply the set of things you do and is the best way for you to influence you environment. It’s also the factor that can account for 40% of your happiness.
Some of my friends are what I like to call “misery-seeking missiles” because their approach to life — and hence their actions and choices — tends to make them unhappy. I should send them this top ten list from Montier’s report, which explains what you can do to be happier:
relatively quickly, the long lasting benefits are essentially zero.
and anxiety. It also stimulates more energy, and is good for the mind and
body.
problems and issues is good for happiness, so work on these relationships.
good aspects of life helps to prevent hedonic adaptation.
work creates happiness, and the easiest way of doing well at work, is doing a
job you enjoy.
resulting in fatigue, gloomy moods and lack of concentration.
people don’t understand what makes them happy, pursuing happiness can be
self-defeating. Additionally, if people start to aim for happiness they are doing
activities for happiness’s sake rather than actually enjoying the activity itself.
happiest when they achieve their aims, so set yourself goals which stretch
you, but are achievable.
actually requires willpower and effort.
If you’d like to read more, I’ve enclosed Montier’s paper for your perusal. Read it, and get working on being happy!
Check this out: a time-lapse video of radar showing FedEx planes flying into Memphis (a FedEx hub) avoiding a thunderstorm. Fascinating stuff if you’re a recovering planespotter like me.
For no real reason at all, here’s me, Wendy and a giant pita at the 14th Good Food Festival and Market, which took place a couple of weekends ago:

It’s been two weeks since the start of The Fuzzy Experiment, in which I decided to test the theory put forth in this article that states that you don’t need shaving cream. Since Tuesday, April 25th, I’ve been skipping the shaving cream and using only a razor. Since I shave immediately after coming out of the shower, it’s not a major change and so far, so good. In fact, not having the shaving cream makes it easier to shave around my trademark goatee and sideburns; I can actually see what I’m doing. Better still, Wendy hasn’t noticed any difference.
I should invest in a shaving mirror for the shower. I suspect that I’d great an even better shave in a nice hot shower. I don’t think I’ll go so “old school” as to add a straight razor to the mix; I can imagine all kinds of unpleasant shaving accidents, especially a few involving “Mister Wiggly”.
The most noticeable effect this experiment has had: a MetaFilter discussion on the topic, which as of this writing has 76 comments! Who knew that shaving was a topic near and dear to the hearts of so many?
More high-tech goodness from Accordion City: BarCamp Toronto takes place from Saturday noon-ish to Sunday noon-ish. I’ll write more, but in the meantime, go check out David Crow’s blog entry and the BarCamp wiki. It’ll be a cool geek gathering, so as I like to say: be there and be square!
The comic does a pretty good job of summarizing my feelings about the opposing arguments on the “immigration” debate in the U.S.. The observant reader will note that I have place “immigration” inside quotes (a.k.a. “sarcasm tongs”). This is to voice my disapproval at the dishonest conflation of the term to include sneaking over the border and taking up residence. It’s a bit of an insult to those of us who did it the legal way, and it gives us an unwarranted stain on our collective reputation. It’s also inconsistent with the left’s insistence that the occupation of Iraq is illegal. there’s gotta be some consistency here, people.

Now don’t get me wrong, folks: I understand the reasons people come to the U.S. and Canada, becuase I have, to use the cliche, been there, done that and got the t-shirt. There are those who will argue that perhaps it’s better if would-be immigrants stayed in their home countries and made them better, but in most cases, that’s infeasible. We’ve got it good here and they’ve got it bad there because of virtuous and vicious circles. Furthermore, we feed both circles — it is often in our best interests to keep third world governments corrupt and kleptocratic and for other countries’ standards of living to be lower than ours. It keeps our goods cheap and plentiful. It is this plenitude that lets sit high atop Maslow’s hierarchy and pursue interests beyond mere survival: personal self-realization, creative expression, intellectual exploration and social justice. The irony is that the only reason we have the luxury of studying Marxist theory (I view Marxist studies as the educational equivalent of the TV show What Not to Wear) in detail beyond “here’s your AK-47; now go hide in the jungle until we tell you to come out shootin'” is because of capitalism.
This brings me to the “illegal immigrants do the jobs that we’re no willing to do” argument. This is essentially the same thing as saying “Hey, they’re an exploitable underclass who are undocumented and therefore can be paid sub-minimum wage. Hot damn, we got us Coolies again!”
Besides, we already have a built-in source of poorly-educated, unskilled labour:
