Here’s a graph that Reuters recently published on gun deaths in Florida before and after the enactment of the “Stand Your Ground” law. Take a really good look at it and see if you can figure out why it’s so terribly misleading:
Click the graph to see the source.
P.A. Fedewa saw the graph in Business Insider and submitted this graph in response. The data is the same, but this time, the presentation isn’t attempting to lie to you:
Click the graph to see the source.
More worrisome than the murder rate should be the rate of people getting away with shooting someone in a situation that isn’t reasonably self-defense (they wouldn’t be reflected on this chart). And the problem there isn’t the stand your ground principle (which is common, even California has that principle), but the lowering of the evidentiary burden and the haphazard way the law is applied.
And yet, I preordered the Ultimate Edition for PS5, just in case it’s actually released.…
How Crunchy Moms became “the most dangerous” group on Facebook In March 2025, less than…
Here’s an editorial I wish I wrote, but it appeared as a post on the…
Hello from Canada, American friends! Here’s a meme of encouragement for you. As I write…
It’s been a couple of Sundays, and the “picdump” is back! After three weeks on…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnsBI4YxwIs If you’re voting in the U.S. midterm elections this Tuesday, last week’s Last Week…
View Comments
Conflating gun deaths with gun murders is also misleading. More worrisome than the murder rate should be the rate of people getting away with shooting someone in a situation that isn't reasonably self-defense (they wouldn't be reflected on this chart). And the problem there isn't the stand your ground principle (which is common, even California has that principle), but the lowering of the evidentiary burden and the haphazard way the law is applied.
Mark Jaquith: Thanks for the comment! I've added your observation to the body of the post.
It's misleading because it looks like a cat licking itself, right?
That, and wtf Reuters, where's the "Sponsored" icon for whomever paid them to flip the chart upside down?
Thanks for this discussion! I used this example recently in a Data Literacy class :-) callingbullshit.org also, in lecture 6.
What I kept wondering about though: Is it known whether Reuters drew the graph based on FDLE data, or whether the latter actually supplied the graph print-ready? I'm not sure which variant would be more worrisome.