If North American cable-and-internet providers were honest, they’d produce an ad that went like this. Note that there’s some swearing involved, as is often the case with cable-and-internet providers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnsBI4YxwIs If you’re voting in the U.S. midterm elections this Tuesday, last week’s Last Week…
While in Tokyo, I had to make at a stop that I’ve always wanted to…
It’s Sunday, and it’s time for another “picdump!” Here are the memes, pictures, and cartoons…
I’m heading to Japan soon, and while researching places to go near Gotokuji, the temple…
It’s Sunday, and it’s time for another “picdump!” Here are the memes, pictures, and cartoons…
If you’re looking to get into the erotic waffle business on a limited budget, there’s…
View Comments
Interesting. It alleges cartel behavior. I'm only aware of the local monopoly/duopoly effect. Cartel behavior (i.e. price-fixing agreements) would be illegal. Not that it would really surprise me.
It's also worth noting that there are at least two options where I live for TV/Internet/Phone services, which is better than what it was a decade ago, where most places just had one option.
It's a tricky problem to solve. Having each company string its own network is really inefficient (but it's what happened when FiOS rolled out). Having one company control the wires is just the worst effects of a government monopoly and a corporate monopoly. What would be interesting, though technically tricky, is letting multiple companies compete over the same wires. Have the local government own the basic infrastructure, but let companies compete for customers by offering services. Like municipal broadband, but with some actual choice.