Categories: In the NewsIt Happened to MeToronto (a.k.a. Accordion City)

All-Candidates Meeting: First Two Questions

Here are my notes from the first two questions asked at Wednesday’s all-candidates meeting. Just in case you missed it, I also have an entry containing my notes on the opening statements.

Question 1: Island Airport

[As a resident of the area] we are in the flight path leading to the Toronto Island airport. We expect that if it goes into the use planned by the Port Authority, we can expect 5 hours of flights and noise…[starts soapboxing]

[Someone in the audience yells “Ask the question!”]

[Taken slightly aback] What are your plans to close the Island airport and shut down the Port Authority?

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party:

Would prefer that it was a big park

Liberals failed to deal with the issue

Now the Port Authority is suing Toronto

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party:

I’m with the GTA caucus, and we were instrumental in killing the Island bridge [part of the plan for the airport]

The federal government was not involved in this issue

The Port Authority serves a purpose [wag in audience says: “Yeah, patronage!”

Remain to be convince that a Port Authority hand-over would be a good thing

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party:

We would consult with people in the neighbourhood for their opinions

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party:

Just as Adscam was a “gift” to Quebec, the Port Authority fiasco was a “gift” to Toronto

The bridge got cancelled, yet we have to pay $32 million [that’s what the Port Authority is suing the city for]

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party:

[unintelligible] don’t know issue [unintelligible] but will listen

Rob Rishchynski, Green Party:

Alternatives exist: service Pearson [Toronto International Airport] with subway link

Question 2: Proportional Representation

The “first past the post” system of elections here leaves many small groups under-represented or locked out. What are your opinions on proportional representation?

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party:

The current system skews democracy and emphasizes regionalism

It is antiquated

The NDP favours a “mixed proportional representation” system [as opposed to a completely proportional one] as recommended by the Canadian Bar Association

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party:

That’s one of our promises

Lorner, Marxist-Leninist

Proportional representation would make things marginally better

The party system is outdated, from a time when white males dominated

Today we are dominated by parties

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party

Proportional representation: interesting

Concerned that “the process is lengthy”

Conservatives have proposed some intermin solutions:
- Independent director of public prosecution
- Federal accountability act

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party:

Will have to discuss this one with the party

Rob Rishchynski, Green Party:

We support it

We’re the only party that you can vote for knowing that we’ll do it

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party [rebutting]:

It was part of our February 2004 Democratic Reform Action Plan!

We had cross-country roundtables

The provinces are looking into it

There’s academic research into the issue

We’re talking to people about it

Proportional representation [in and of itself] is not always the answer — you need political will

Joey deVilla

Next January 31st: ESRI Canada/Bell Mobility Location-Based Services Seminar »

Previous « Photos from Wednesday's All-Candidates Meeting

View Comments

Anonymous says:

January 13, 2006 at 10:09 am

Rob Rishchynski, Green Party:

* Alternatives exist: service Pearson [Toronto International Airport] with subway link

I don't think that's quite what Rishchynski meant -- he was raising additional concern about the proposed rail link to Pearson, which would run through this riding and potentially also create noise/pollution/etc. issues.

--Robyn