“Harry Potter is a sexist neo-conservative autocrat.” — Pierre Bruno, Liberation
(Keep in mind that Pierre Bruno is French, where they prefer their sexist autocrats to be neo-liberal.)
While Ron Weasley is really the more courageous one and Hermione is the better wizard by far, Harry gets all the glory (and if he eventually gets some damned testosterone, all the ladies — assuming, of course, he is straight. He may not be — don’t British men secretly want to be with other British men?).
Why? Because his parents are Hogwarts’ star alumni, he has powerful connections with the faculty, he’s a rich white kid and he’s the sports star of the school. In other words, he’s a jock with a broom.
An article in Slate expands on this idea, as does this book, The Irresistible Rise of Harry Potter.
We may have to start a Draco Malfoy fan club.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AvuwH_KyiKY Maybe it’s just me, or perhaps it’s the song itself, but I find that…
Advice in old-timey books was just plain weird, man.
Trump’s video You’ve probably heard about the AI-generated video that Trump posted to Truth Social,…
I saw the display pictured above a couple of days ago, and it’s evidence we’re…
It’s that time of year, and this is that kind of blog, so here’s the 2026…
I’ve done the occasional Tampa-to-St. Pete commute during peak times, and they can easily stretch…