<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math is for Liberal Elitists, Anyway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/</link>
	<description>Joey deVilla's Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27594</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/#comment-27594</guid>
		<description>Judge rules: graphical inelegance, no math failure. Your counter-counter-pennance is to take up residence in America&#039;s unwashed rainbow propeller hat: Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judge rules: graphical inelegance, no math failure. Your counter-counter-pennance is to take up residence in America&#8217;s unwashed rainbow propeller hat: Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey deVilla</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27572</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey deVilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/#comment-27572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mark Jaquith:&lt;/strong&gt; Yes, I figured that these were overlapping percentages, but the use of a pie chart to represent this isn&#039;t quite right -- it&#039;s about as &quot;non-standard&quot; as using a brick to hammer in nails. Yes, it works, but surely there&#039;s something better!

Your penance for trolling is to take up residence in &quot;America&#039;s Wang&quot;: Florida. Oh, wait a minute...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mark Jaquith:</strong> Yes, I figured that these were overlapping percentages, but the use of a pie chart to represent this isn&#8217;t quite right &#8212; it&#8217;s about as &#8220;non-standard&#8221; as using a brick to hammer in nails. Yes, it works, but surely there&#8217;s something better!</p>
<p>Your penance for trolling is to take up residence in &#8220;America&#8217;s Wang&#8221;: Florida. Oh, wait a minute&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27571</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/#comment-27571</guid>
		<description>• 100% of the people in my house support cat ownership.
• 50% of the people in my house support dog ownership.

Which is more likely: that I messed up the poll, or that &lt;strong&gt;support of dogs is not mutually exclusive of support of cats&lt;/strong&gt;?

Your liberal elitist math is no match for skepticism and The Google. Also appearing in the poll but not on the pie chart is Oprah Winfrey with a 46% favorability rating among Republicans (seriously). Using a pie chart to represent independent percentages that might add up to more than 100% is non-standard, but not incorrect. Pie charts represent relative values, not exclusive percentage values.

For your penance, you must buy a loaf of non-organic non-fair-trade bread and shed a single tear as you contemplate what on earth you&#039;re going to do with the five dollars you saved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>• 100% of the people in my house support cat ownership.<br />
• 50% of the people in my house support dog ownership.</p>
<p>Which is more likely: that I messed up the poll, or that <strong>support of dogs is not mutually exclusive of support of cats</strong>?</p>
<p>Your liberal elitist math is no match for skepticism and The Google. Also appearing in the poll but not on the pie chart is Oprah Winfrey with a 46% favorability rating among Republicans (seriously). Using a pie chart to represent independent percentages that might add up to more than 100% is non-standard, but not incorrect. Pie charts represent relative values, not exclusive percentage values.</p>
<p>For your penance, you must buy a loaf of non-organic non-fair-trade bread and shed a single tear as you contemplate what on earth you&#8217;re going to do with the five dollars you saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slava</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27569</link>
		<dc:creator>Slava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/#comment-27569</guid>
		<description>My favourite part: &quot;SOURCE: OPINIONS&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite part: &#8220;SOURCE: OPINIONS&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Charabaruk</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27566</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/#comment-27566</guid>
		<description>Ah, good old Fox. I&#039;ll bet they think the number 100 supports terrorism or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good old Fox. I&#8217;ll bet they think the number 100 supports terrorism or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-27565</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2009/11/26/math-is-for-liberal-elitists-anyway/#comment-27565</guid>
		<description>Two things come to mind.

First, this new math could give the republicans more votes.

Second, the republicans seem to have bought Google Ads.  You&#039;re entire advertising is dominated by the former Governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things come to mind.</p>
<p>First, this new math could give the republicans more votes.</p>
<p>Second, the republicans seem to have bought Google Ads.  You&#8217;re entire advertising is dominated by the former Governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
