<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Current Brouhaha in Canadian Politics, Explained Briefly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/</link>
	<description>Joey deVilla's Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:55:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: False Positives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canadian Word of the Year : Prorogue</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17929</link>
		<dc:creator>False Positives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canadian Word of the Year : Prorogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17929</guid>
		<description>[...] to the events of Dec 2008, I was not , nor where most Canadians, familiar with this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the events of Dec 2008, I was not , nor where most Canadians, familiar with this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strange Brouhaha &#171; Haddock Ailment</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator>Strange Brouhaha &#171; Haddock Ailment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17858</guid>
		<description>[...] (unprecedented?) move to replace the current government with a coalition.  Joey de V posts an excellent summary of the goings on in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (unprecedented?) move to replace the current government with a coalition.  Joey de V posts an excellent summary of the goings on in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Jayasekera</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17825</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Jayasekera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17825</guid>
		<description>As I view this post, there is an ad on the page showing a photo of Stephen Harper and the text &quot;His IQ is 125 - Are You Smarter than Stephen Harper? Take the IQ Test Here!&quot;

Well, right now it seems as though just about everyone is smarter than Stephen Harper.  It&#039;s a good reminder that being &quot;smart&quot; depends not just on raw IQ but also on other factors such as sensitivity to others.  Mr. Harper may have a decent IQ, but he still made a boneheaded decision because, as usual, he didn&#039;t really care what anyone else thought.  Unfortunately it&#039;s not just him who has to pay the price for his arrogance -- we all do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I view this post, there is an ad on the page showing a photo of Stephen Harper and the text &#8220;His IQ is 125 &#8211; Are You Smarter than Stephen Harper? Take the IQ Test Here!&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, right now it seems as though just about everyone is smarter than Stephen Harper.  It&#8217;s a good reminder that being &#8220;smart&#8221; depends not just on raw IQ but also on other factors such as sensitivity to others.  Mr. Harper may have a decent IQ, but he still made a boneheaded decision because, as usual, he didn&#8217;t really care what anyone else thought.  Unfortunately it&#8217;s not just him who has to pay the price for his arrogance &#8212; we all do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17803</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17803</guid>
		<description>Joey,

Congrats on choosing &quot;Brouhaha&quot; to describe the current situation. It is unprecedented but it is *not* a crisis. Let&#039;s everybody stay cool. Brouhaha provides the necessary ironic distance a responsible citizen should maintain in their thought and discussion. 

There&#039;s a (probably NDP sponsored since that&#039;s whereI got the link from) petition to support the proposed coaltion at http://www.62percentmajority.ca/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey,</p>
<p>Congrats on choosing &#8220;Brouhaha&#8221; to describe the current situation. It is unprecedented but it is *not* a crisis. Let&#8217;s everybody stay cool. Brouhaha provides the necessary ironic distance a responsible citizen should maintain in their thought and discussion. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a (probably NDP sponsored since that&#8217;s whereI got the link from) petition to support the proposed coaltion at <a href="http://www.62percentmajority.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://www.62percentmajority.ca/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Megginson</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17789</link>
		<dc:creator>David Megginson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17789</guid>
		<description>Excellent summary!  I wish I could have been so succinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent summary!  I wish I could have been so succinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey deVilla</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17782</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey deVilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17782</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@David Janes:&lt;/strong&gt; Noted, and corrected. 

I got the bit about corporate donations wrong. I also decided to make explicit what was in kmjy head as I was writing the article: that the Conservatives have been doing the necessary legwork in their fundraising activities, while other parties, notably the Liberals, haven&#039;t been so hot at it. I&#039;m reminded of the difference between the Republicans&#039; and Democrats&#039; online grassroots efforts during the 2004 American elections, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joeydevilla.com/2004/12/19/notes-from-internetsociety-2004-the-election-panel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;which are noted in a blog entry of mine from the Internet+Society conference at Harvard in 2004&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the heads-up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@David Janes:</strong> Noted, and corrected. </p>
<p>I got the bit about corporate donations wrong. I also decided to make explicit what was in kmjy head as I was writing the article: that the Conservatives have been doing the necessary legwork in their fundraising activities, while other parties, notably the Liberals, haven&#8217;t been so hot at it. I&#8217;m reminded of the difference between the Republicans&#8217; and Democrats&#8217; online grassroots efforts during the 2004 American elections, <a href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2004/12/19/notes-from-internetsociety-2004-the-election-panel/" rel="nofollow">which are noted in a blog entry of mine from the Internet+Society conference at Harvard in 2004</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads-up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17778</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17778</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s another problem with the summary. The Conservatives have removed the cancellation of public financing from their financial update. It&#039;s no longer an issue. The other parties are now saying Harper is mishandling the economy because it didn&#039;t include a stimulus package in the update. 

In any case, Harper has lost the confidence of the House and is screwed unless he can prorogue Parliament -- just weeks after the Throne Speech and without actually accomplishing anything as a government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another problem with the summary. The Conservatives have removed the cancellation of public financing from their financial update. It&#8217;s no longer an issue. The other parties are now saying Harper is mishandling the economy because it didn&#8217;t include a stimulus package in the update. </p>
<p>In any case, Harper has lost the confidence of the House and is screwed unless he can prorogue Parliament &#8212; just weeks after the Throne Speech and without actually accomplishing anything as a government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Janes</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17777</link>
		<dc:creator>David Janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17777</guid>
		<description>Your point two is incomplete, misleading and wrong:

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Corporate donations are banned by C-24; the CPC does not live off even in part on &quot;corporate donations&quot;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Other political parties - which we&#039;re often reminded comprise 60% of the vote in total - &lt;i&gt;can&lt;i&gt; and have lived of private donations as C-24 is only legislation that is 6 years old; it&#039;s just a matter of their supporters getting of their collective asses and tossing in 10 or 20 bucks (or a 100 or 200). Given that their supporters tend to be urban and above the median income line, this is hardly asking for a lot.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

That all said, you used the same word I was using yesterday: Harper was being a dick and is now going to pay the price with his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point two is incomplete, misleading and wrong:</p>
<ul>
<li>Corporate donations are banned by C-24; the CPC does not live off even in part on &#8220;corporate donations&#8221;</li>
<li>Other political parties &#8211; which we&#8217;re often reminded comprise 60% of the vote in total &#8211; <i>can</i><i> and have lived of private donations as C-24 is only legislation that is 6 years old; it&#8217;s just a matter of their supporters getting of their collective asses and tossing in 10 or 20 bucks (or a 100 or 200). Given that their supporters tend to be urban and above the median income line, this is hardly asking for a lot.</i></li>
</ul>
<p>That all said, you used the same word I was using yesterday: Harper was being a dick and is now going to pay the price with his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Kuno</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/comment-page-1/#comment-17771</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Kuno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/12/02/the-current-brouhaha-in-canadian-politics-explained-briefly/#comment-17771</guid>
		<description>Way to cut through the fog and illuminate the fine points so quickly, Joey.

Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to cut through the fog and illuminate the fine points so quickly, Joey.</p>
<p>Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
