<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservapedia Obsessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/</link>
	<description>Joey deVilla's Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Conservapedia: Still Obsessed &#187; The Adventures of Accordion Guy in the 21st Century : Joey deVilla&#8217;s Personal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-11809</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Conservapedia: Still Obsessed &#187; The Adventures of Accordion Guy in the 21st Century : Joey deVilla&#8217;s Personal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/#comment-11809</guid>
		<description>[...] of the more popular entries in this blog is Conservapedia Obsessions, which revealed that according to Conservapedia&#8217;s own stats page, 9 of its 10 most-read pages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the more popular entries in this blog is Conservapedia Obsessions, which revealed that according to Conservapedia&#8217;s own stats page, 9 of its 10 most-read pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uchiha</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-10105</link>
		<dc:creator>Uchiha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/#comment-10105</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s true (and fairly obvious) that the stats are being boosted by refreshbots of some sort. But who wrote and sanctionned all those article - including gems like &quot;Gay Bowel Syndrome&quot; and &quot;Homosexuality and Scotland&quot; - in the first place? That was all Conservapedia&#039;s doing. More specifically, the doing of a certain User:Conservative, whose subsequent exploits can be viewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:Summa_Homosexualita&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

With respect to &lt;a href=&quot;www.rationalwiki.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RationalWiki&lt;/a&gt;, the boost was not actually any sort of organized or even acknowledged effort. You can see RationalWiki&#039;s stance on Conservapedia &lt;a href=&quot;www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; - while their distaste for the site is apparent, vandalism, in general, is not condoned. 

Evidently there&#039;s a good chance that whoever did this does have an account at &lt;a href=&quot;www.rationalwiki.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RationalWiki&lt;/a&gt;, , but that doesn&#039;t make the site accountable for the vandalism - and certainly not for Conservapedia&#039;s inherent insanity anyway.

So in conclusion: it&#039;s still hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s true (and fairly obvious) that the stats are being boosted by refreshbots of some sort. But who wrote and sanctionned all those article &#8211; including gems like &#8220;Gay Bowel Syndrome&#8221; and &#8220;Homosexuality and Scotland&#8221; &#8211; in the first place? That was all Conservapedia&#8217;s doing. More specifically, the doing of a certain User:Conservative, whose subsequent exploits can be viewed <a href="http://www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:Summa_Homosexualita" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>With respect to <a href="www.rationalwiki.com" rel="nofollow">RationalWiki</a>, the boost was not actually any sort of organized or even acknowledged effort. You can see RationalWiki&#8217;s stance on Conservapedia <a href="www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia" rel="nofollow">here</a> &#8211; while their distaste for the site is apparent, vandalism, in general, is not condoned. </p>
<p>Evidently there&#8217;s a good chance that whoever did this does have an account at <a href="www.rationalwiki.com" rel="nofollow">RationalWiki</a>, , but that doesn&#8217;t make the site accountable for the vandalism &#8211; and certainly not for Conservapedia&#8217;s inherent insanity anyway.</p>
<p>So in conclusion: it&#8217;s still hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservatipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-10103</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservatipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/#comment-10103</guid>
		<description>Hey everyone, Conservapedia is a weird site. You&#039;ll notice I own conservatipedia, which is spelled different and designed to mock.

I found this article to be pretty funny. Who would of guessed gay bowel syndrome would be such a hot topic.

I noticed they changed the page counts probably yesterday. The other day I put the exact counts on my site, now gay bowel movement has only 100 page views instead of 300,000.

What a bunch of douchebags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone, Conservapedia is a weird site. You&#8217;ll notice I own conservatipedia, which is spelled different and designed to mock.</p>
<p>I found this article to be pretty funny. Who would of guessed gay bowel syndrome would be such a hot topic.</p>
<p>I noticed they changed the page counts probably yesterday. The other day I put the exact counts on my site, now gay bowel movement has only 100 page views instead of 300,000.</p>
<p>What a bunch of douchebags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Riff&#153; was Constantinople &#187; Used Erections</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Riff&#153; was Constantinople &#187; Used Erections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/#comment-9925</guid>
		<description>[...] ceiling.   &#8226; Halo 3 cheat codes, as explained by neglected girlfriend Janet Iverson &#8226; Conservapedia Obsessions &#8226; GilTV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ceiling.   &#8226; Halo 3 cheat codes, as explained by neglected girlfriend Janet Iverson &#8226; Conservapedia Obsessions &#8226; GilTV [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: safetychick</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/comment-page-1/#comment-9914</link>
		<dc:creator>safetychick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2007/11/20/conservapedia-obsessions/#comment-9914</guid>
		<description>Ha! Snort! Conservatism and sex scandals - I wonder if they have that page in their Conservapedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Snort! Conservatism and sex scandals &#8211; I wonder if they have that page in their Conservapedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
