Comments on: The Attractiveness/Relationship Graph http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/ Joey deVilla's Personal Blog Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:32:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Josh http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-15424 Josh Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:42:12 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-15424 For a 2D model, it's not bad. To be really accurate it would need, say about, five dimensions or so? For a 2D model, it’s not bad. To be really accurate it would need, say about, five dimensions or so?

]]> By: TheUiGuy http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-15234 TheUiGuy Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:03:58 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-15234 The zone of pain seems to be too far away from marriage. Often they are one and the same (unless this graph is a torus) It also seems to indicate that people with increasing attractiveness and mental attractiveness are often good candidates for marriage. For men perhaps... but for women the graph should financially wealthy on the top to bottom, and "how much they treat me like crap" going left to right... which makes an "asshole with a lot of money" the prime candidate for women. Done and done. The zone of pain seems to be too far away from marriage. Often they are one and the same (unless this graph is a torus)

It also seems to indicate that people with increasing attractiveness and mental attractiveness are often good candidates for marriage.

For men perhaps… but for women the graph should financially wealthy on the top to bottom, and “how much they treat me like crap” going left to right… which makes an “asshole with a lot of money” the prime candidate for women.

Done and done.

]]> By: Joey deVilla http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14994 Joey deVilla Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:11:06 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14994 <strong>@sporktine:</strong> In basic set theory, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_set" rel="nofollow">null set</a> means a set with no members, so yes, for the purposes of this particular diagram, you can treat it as "does not exist". @sporktine: In basic set theory, a null set means a set with no members, so yes, for the purposes of this particular diagram, you can treat it as “does not exist”.

]]> By: sporktine http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14990 sporktine Sun, 03 Aug 2008 07:03:32 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14990 Seriously. Don't you know anyone who got married after two weeks of knowing each other? that's the people married outside of dating. What I don't get is the null set. is that just "does not exist"? Seriously. Don’t you know anyone who got married after two weeks of knowing each other? that’s the people married outside of dating. What I don’t get is the null set. is that just “does not exist”?

]]> By: i LOVE venn diagrams « take this pink ribbon off my eyes http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14988 i LOVE venn diagrams « take this pink ribbon off my eyes Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:18:20 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14988 [...] intoxicated by adoration i LOVE venn diagrams August 2, 2008 via stumbleupon via accordian guy via [...] [...] intoxicated by adoration i LOVE venn diagrams August 2, 2008 via stumbleupon via accordian guy via [...]

]]> By: Rick http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14959 Rick Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:23:13 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-14959 @Anonymous 3: You have mommy issues. The graph is spot on! @Anonymous 3:

You have mommy issues. The graph is spot on!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-8231 Anonymous Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:48:00 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-8231 The Zone of Pain needs to be larger. I'm thinkin', it should encompass the entire Venn diagram. The Zone of Pain needs to be larger. I’m thinkin’, it should encompass the entire Venn diagram.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-8230 Anonymous Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:50:00 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-8230 Marry them for their money, but not if their too ugly :D Marry them for their money, but not if their too ugly :D

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-8229 Anonymous Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:01:00 +0000 http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/09/26/the-attractivenessrelationship-graph/#comment-8229 The graph suggests that there are people who are marriage potential that you wouldn't date. The graph suggests that there are people who are marriage potential that you wouldn’t date.

]]>