<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Good Neal Stephenson Quip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2005/06/27/a-good-neal-stephenson-quip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2005/06/27/a-good-neal-stephenson-quip/</link>
	<description>Joey deVilla's Personal Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1-alpha-10188</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2005/06/27/a-good-neal-stephenson-quip/comment-page-1/#comment-5989</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2005/06/27/a-good-neal-stephenson-quip/#comment-5989</guid>
		<description>I think it's a matter of degree. What you're describing is &lt;em&gt;constructive critique&lt;/em&gt;, while Stephenson is using the word "trash". I agree with you and will go farther by saying that many great leaps forward are the result of such critiquing. I also believe that Stephenson is responding to the "familiarity breeds contempt" &lt;em&gt;automatic&lt;/em&gt; dismissal of anything "Western" that is fashionable in certain circles, such as academia.

  The short and sassy summary: You say &lt;em&gt;to-may-toe&lt;/em&gt;, he says &lt;em&gt;gazpacho&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a matter of degree. What you&#8217;re describing is <em>constructive critique</em>, while Stephenson is using the word &#8220;trash&#8221;. I agree with you and will go farther by saying that many great leaps forward are the result of such critiquing. I also believe that Stephenson is responding to the &#8220;familiarity breeds contempt&#8221; <em>automatic</em> dismissal of anything &#8220;Western&#8221; that is fashionable in certain circles, such as academia.</p>
<p>  The short and sassy summary: You say <em>to-may-toe</em>, he says <em>gazpacho</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.joeydevilla.com/2005/06/27/a-good-neal-stephenson-quip/comment-page-1/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joeydevilla.com/2005/06/27/a-good-neal-stephenson-quip/#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>With no context, I can't be sure exactly what Mr. Stephenson meant by this, but I'm afraid he is off the mark here.  To use his own metaphor, for a Westerner to trash Western culture is like finding our nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere increasingly difficult to breathe because of fossil-fuel pollution, and saying that that is bad, and that we must do something about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With no context, I can&#8217;t be sure exactly what Mr. Stephenson meant by this, but I&#8217;m afraid he is off the mark here.  To use his own metaphor, for a Westerner to trash Western culture is like finding our nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere increasingly difficult to breathe because of fossil-fuel pollution, and saying that that is bad, and that we must do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
