And Here I Thought It Was a Contradiction in Terms

by Joey deVilla on February 16, 2005

Kirrily “Skud” Robert has started a blog on a little-covered but much-needed area of discussion: Geek Etiquette.

Kudos, Kirrily!

Photo: T-shirt with rude integral.

A free giant Santa “Pez” dispenser to the first person who can tell me in the comments why this T-shirt is rude.

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 9:13 am

69?

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 9:21 am

You are correct, sir! The Santa “Pez” dispenser is yours!

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 9:23 am

And I was just about to post the answer! ARGHHH!!! WHY DO I ALWAYS FAIL? I CAN’T TAKE IT ANYMORE…

I mean, Congratulations Darryl!

Dan

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 9:50 am

It would have been easier if you hadn’t printed the integral upside down ;-)
Stu Savory

http://www.savory.de/blog.htm

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 11:36 am

Where can I buy one?

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 12:11 pm

A Pez dispenser, a t-shirt or a 69?

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 12:31 pm

The shirt, silly.

Anonymous 02.16.05 at 6:23 pm

And then you realise how much of math you have forgotten :(
And I loved math…..

Anonymous 02.17.05 at 1:53 am
Anonymous 02.17.05 at 8:38 am

Whew! Right there with you, Richard.

I mean, I have a degree in aerospace engineering (now 10 years old and completely unused)…

Anonymous 02.17.05 at 9:09 am

Nitpick here. I think technically the post did not “explain why the t-shirt is rude”, and so shouldn’t get the prize. What I mean is it didn’t explain to us non-math types what the meaning of the statement was. [i.e. that it's an example of integral notation, invented by Leibniz IIRC, which given the inputs evaluates to 13^2 - 10^2, which equals 69, which is a slang reference to a sexual position.] If you’re going to lord over us ignorant types, at least have the courtesy to explain the joke.

Anonymous 02.17.05 at 10:19 am

I was going to explain the joke, when I had a moment. It’s a matter of scheduling, not lording.

As for whether Darryl’s answer was a qualifying one, I’m not going to nitpick a la Jeopardy (”Correct, but you didn’t phrase it as a question!”). By the bye, Darryl doesn’t know any calculus — he just made an educated guess.

Anonymous 02.17.05 at 12:02 pm

That and I googled part of the phrase and found the site where the shirt is sold (see my other post — http://www.instantattitudes.com/shirts/t005.html). There it explains the math of squaring 13 (13 x 13) and 10 (10 x 10), subtracting the second answer from the first answer and…

Anonymous 02.20.05 at 9:02 pm

Well! We wondered why we’d suddenly gotten a spate of orders for that shirt. Then a friend mentioned having seen this post, and sent me the link. Thanks for the PR!

Russ & Lee / Instant Attitudes

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>